A jolt for those who object to TASERs
By Gordon Dillow, Orange County Register
The police use of TASER electric-shock guns to subdue dangerous suspects has become a controversial issue - in the news media at least. But if you’re worried about potential health risks from getting shot by a TASER, they’re actually pretty easy to avoid.
One excellent way to do that is to refrain from getting skied up on powerful drugs and smashing a window to burglarize a home and then trying to fight it out with the cops. What brings this up is the death late last month of a guy named Richard Alvarado, 38, a chronic criminal who reportedly was spending a Sunday evening cranked up on a “speedball” of heroin and cocaine. At about 7 p.m., Alvarado apparently decided to smash a bathroom window and crawl inside an apartment on Mitchell Street in Tustin to burglarize it. Fortunately, the elderly woman who lived there wasn’t home.
When Tustin police arrived on the scene they found Alvarado in the bathroom, bleeding profusely from cuts from the broken window glass, apparently under the influence of drugs and refusing to comply with orders to surrender. The officers tried to physically restrain him, but he resisted.
Think about it. Almost all of those people who died were high on alcohol or drugs - which is generally why a suspect needs a TASERing in the first place. That was also the case in the only other fatal TASER-related incident in Orange County, that one involving a guy who was TASERed by Brea police in 2003 while he was high on methamphetamine. And even Amnesty International says only that those 103 people died after being TASERed, not necessarily as a direct result of being TASERed. In the vast majority of those cases, autopsies have shown that the TASER shot was not the cause of death. Meanwhile, according to the manufacturer, TASER International, TASERs have been used on suspects in the field some 71,000 times in the past five years, along with 100,000 “demonstrations” in police training and elsewhere, with no lasting ill effects. Somehow, 100 deaths out of 71,000 field uses hardly seems like a wave of death-after-TASER.
And what would happen if TASERs were banned? Simple. A lot more cops would be injured in physical fights with suspects, and a lot more suspects would be injured by police batons or wind up getting legally shot by police. Consider, for example, what happened in Tustin last fall when a drug-crazed man who had attacked his wife also attacked two Tustin cops who responded to the call. The officers could have legally aced the guy - that is, shot him - but instead they used batons, pepper spray and a TASER to control him. That guy probably lived because of a TASER - whether he deserved to or not - and the officers were awarded department Medals of Merit for their skill and restraint in the use of force. Of course, no one is suggesting that cops use TASERs on jaywalkers or kids riding bikes without helmets. And I’m certainly not saying that getting TASERed is fun. “It’s not pleasant,” says TASER International spokesman Steve Tuttle, who has experienced it in demonstrations. “But if I had a choice between the TASER and getting shot or even hit with a baton, I’d take the TASER any day.” Exactly. So don’t let Amnesty International fool you. In almost every case, TASERs don’t take lives. They save them.
Gordon may be reached at (714) 796-7953 or by e-mail at email@example.com.
PoliceOne's team of expert writers provides our readers with valuable insight from both on-the-job and classroom experience.
To submit articles or become a columnist click here and include your background/CV and a sample of your writing.
Today's Top Stories
|Tuesday, July 29, 2014|
|All of Today's News|
Discuss The NewsPoliceOne News and Current Events Forum More Forums
Officer DownAll Officer Downs Submit an Officer Down
The PoliceOne Firearms Corner
with Ron Avery