|

|
|
July
17, 2007
|

Table
of Contents:
I. Can we train too
much?
II. Upcoming Street Survival
Seminars

Can
we train too much?
By Dick Fairburn
Not long ago a co-worker
was setting up for a federally funded week-long Radar/Lidar
Instructor course. The manual for the course filled a four-inch ring
binder and included a great deal of complicated math formulas. Just
to train a cop how to point a radar unit and pull the trigger? I
agree that an instructor needs to know more than the students they
will train, but this course was apparently designed to produce
someone qualified to be a courtroom expert witness (though I doubt
this class alone would qualify someone to stand up to a thorough
expert witness challenge).

Another example is the
current deadline for senior police and fire commanders to complete
high level Incident Command System (ICS) training, specifically
ICS300 and ICS400. Having been an ICS instructor for some time, I am
better able to comment on the foolishness of these requirements. In
particular, ICS400 is intended for Command and General Staff
personnel working in a Type 1 event, like Hurricane Katrina. Even
when they've sat through all of these mind numbing days of
instruction, few commanders really know how to use the ICS
effectively.
Yes, in my opinion, we
can train too much. These federal requirements that try to turn
everyone into a high-level expert simply produce a number of burned
out, modestly trained personnel with little more than "book
learnin'" on a given subject. Whether the subject is Radar, ICS, or
something else, the first stage of training program design must be
to determine what the end user TRULY needs to know to be effective.
We don't need to teach all of our people how to build a Glock, just
how to shoot one!
I break training
material into three "Know" categories:
• "Need to know" •
"Nice to know," • "Know where to look it up"
The OSHA required annual
refresher course on Hazardous Materials serves as an excellent
example of how a four-hour class could be (and should be) boiled
down to one hour.
"Need to know" material
is essential to the task at hand. In our HazMat refresher example,
knowing how to look up a material to determine it's dangers (how can
this stuff hurt my people?) and evacuation distances (how far do I
need to move my people from this stuff?) is crucial and should be
the heart and soul of the training. So, knowing how to use the book
under stress by looking up the product's name and/or placard number
is - "Need to know." In reality, I would estimate that more than 80
percent of the officers attending our Critical Incident classes
can't remember how to look up a material in the Emergency Response
Guidebook (ERG), even though they have attended the refresher every
year of their careers.
Much of the "Need to
know" information is pretty dry and boring, so adding a little "Nice
to know" information can keep a student's attention. Examples of how
officers in their area have been injured or killed at HazMat
incidents will always get their attention. Too much "Nice to know"
information is generally the sign of an instructor that loves the
given subject matter a lot more than their students. Design your
courses around the audience you will serve and don't waste their
time.
In the case of the
annual HazMat refresher, all the hundreds of pages of specific
material data in the ERG fall into the "Know where to Look It Up"
category. Any instructor that has actually memorized a good deal of
the data sheets in the Emergency Response Guidebook is an instructor
to avoid. They think "Know where to look it up" material is "Need to
know" information. It isn't.
So, let's summarize a
sensible HazMat refresher session. Teach the students the various
sections of the Guidebook and how to look up a material by both
placard number and name. Give them local examples of spilled
materials and the bad effects those materials had on emergency
responders. Practice, as a group, looking up commonly found
materials by both name and placard number. Cover the generic
response pages for unknown substances in case a spilled material
cannot be readily identified. That will take no more than 30 to 60
minutes. And, since you focused on the primary "Need to know"
information (knowing how to look up the "Know where to look it up"
information), they will probably remember the lesson and be able to
identify a material under the stress of a real incident.
Do you understand my
point here? We DO NOT need to teach our students the countless
products in the ERG or expect them to memorize details. We DO need
to teach them how to use the book under stress. The same principles
apply to ICS, Firearms, Control and Arrest Tactics, and on and on.
We need a few genuine
experts in every field of law enforcement. We truly need a pool of
ICS experts who can build the full organization should a Type 1
event ever hit their locale. But, we need MANY more that have a
basic understanding of the organization and a FULL understanding of
how to fulfill their particular role at a lower level. We need a FEW
"builders" and a LOT of "do-ers."
The philosophy that training everyone to the "builder" level will
automatically teach them how also to be a "do-er" has been proven
wrong time after time.
Police agencies have a
finite amount of time and money to contribute to training. Our
mission as trainers is to give them the biggest possible bang for
that buck. Just as importantly, we need to give our officers the
absolute essentials they need to do their job as safely and
effectively as possible. I have found that my personal "hard drive"
has a finite amount of space available. It seems, as the years pile
up, that my hard drive has begun to send unused information to my
computer's "recycle bin." And, it gets worse every year. Streamline
your training to emphasize the Need to Know information and your
officers will thank you for it.
About
the author
Dick Fairburn has had
more than 26 years of law enforcement experience. He has worked
patrol, investigations and administration. Since 1996 he has been
with the Illinois State Police serving as a Criminal Intelligence
Analyst, as the Section Chief of the Academy's Firearms Training
Unit and as the Critical Incident Training Coordinator.
He has a B.S. in Law
Enforcement Administration from Western Illinois University and was the Valedictorian of
his class at the Illinois State Police Academy. He has published
hundreds of articles and a book titled, Police
Rifles.
II.
Upcoming Street Survival Seminars
|
Seminar Location |
Dates |
Details |
|
Street
Survival Seminar Phoenix,AZ |
August 6-7,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Chicago,IL |
August 16-17,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Ann
Arbor/Detroit,MI |
September 5-6,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Seattle/Tacoma,WA |
September 13-14,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Pittsburgh,PA |
September 17-18,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Las
Cruces,NM |
October 8-9,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar San
Francisco,CA |
October 17-18,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Milwaukee,WI |
October 22-23,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Dallas/Ft
Worth,TX |
November 1-2,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar for WOMEN Atlantic
City,NJ |
November 5-6,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Street
Survival Seminar Las
Vegas,NV |
December 4-5,
2007 |
Detail
|
|
Not
coming to your area? Please contact
Slavka Younger at
slavka.younger@praetoriangroup.com
to find out how you can bring Street Survival seminar to your
department. |
Help
us keep you safe. Send your story ideas and opinions, as well as
material for Weapons Warning and Concealment Gallery to Newsline.
Send e-mail to the editor: newsline@calibrepress.com
Return to
top
Click here
for a printer friendly version of this
newsline
|