Supreme Court plans new debate on police searches

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON- The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will schedule a special argument session so the newest justice can join in deciding a police search case.

Justices Samuel Alito's vote apparently is needed to break a tie in the case, which asks whether evidence can be used from the search of a Detroit man's house because police did not bother knocking before they broke down his door.

The case was argued the first time at the court on Jan. 9 _ three weeks before Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired and was replaced by Alito.

O'Connor seemed ready to rule against police. "Is there no policy protecting the home owner a little bit?" she asked during the argument.

The state of Michigan, which is backed by the Bush administration, argued that even though officers made a mistake by rushing into Booker Hudson's home, the blunder was not related to the finding of the drugs and should not require a judge to bar the evidence.

Justices have had to reschedule two other cases that were argued when O'Connor was on the court but not resolved before her departure. Those involve a Kansas death penalty law and government whistleblowers.

The Detroit case will be reargued in the next month, with a decision before July.

The case is Hudson v. Michigan, 04-1360.

Associated PressCopyright 2015 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Recommended Legal

Join the discussion

Be the first
to comment
PoliceOne comments can only be accessed by verified law enforcement professionals.
Please sign in or register to view or write your own comments below.