NY judge rejects stop-frisk police union claims

Judge has rejected efforts by police unions to overturn a ruling concluding that stop-and-frisk tactics are sometimes discriminatory

Associated Press

NEW YORK — A judge has rejected efforts by police unions to overturn a ruling concluding that New York City's stop-and-frisk tactics are sometimes discriminatory.

Judge Analisa Torres issued the decision Wednesday. The unions had sued to get the ruling overturned after the city decided to settle the case. It agreed to make reforms to the program to ensure there is no discrimination against minorities.

The judge rejected the unions' claims the reputations of their members were damaged by the decision finding discrimination.

She says employees suffer no legally protectable harm to their reputation merely because their employer is found liable in a lawsuit. She also says they had no legal standing.

She says police unions can participate in a process to reform the stop-and-frisk program.

There was no immediate union response.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press

Associated PressCopyright 2015 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  1. Tags
  2. Investigations
  3. Patrol Issues
  4. Lawsuit
  5. New York
  6. NYPD
  7. Search
  8. Union
  9. Stop and Frisk

Recommended Legal

Join the discussion

Be the first
to comment
PoliceOne comments can only be accessed by verified law enforcement professionals.
Please sign in or register to view or write your own comments below.