Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Home  >  Topics  >  Legal

October 01, 2004
PrintCommentRSS

Quinlan Publishing Group Case Summaries on Legal Compliance
with Quinlan Publishing Group

Limbaugh loses first round in battle to suppress medical records

Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeals recently issued a written ruling denying Rush Limbaugh's request to suppress medical records, which were seized in connection with the government’s investigation into his reported drug use.

In October 2003, Limbaugh announced that he was addicted to painkillers and that he was voluntarily entering into a drug treatment program. By that time, however, Limbaugh’s former housekeeper had already sold a story to the National Enquirer claiming her boss had been illegally buying painkillers from her.

While investigating the housekeeper's statements, the government began to suspect that, in addition to buying pills from her, Limbaugh engaged in the practice of “doctor shopping” -- going from doctor to doctor with the intention of finding one who would prescribe him more painkillers. Such practice is a felony in Florida.

After obtaining a search warrant, authorities seized Limbaugh’s medical records in November and December of last year, as well as prescription records from drug stores where he obtained the painkillers. Those records showed that Limbaugh obtained approximately 2,000 pills over a three-month period.

Limbaugh challenged the seizure, claiming the government’s failure to give notice or to issue a subpoena requesting the records gave him no opportunity to challenge the request and therefore violated his Fourth Amendment privacy rights. In response, the government claimed giving notice or issuing a subpoena would have impeded the investigation by giving Limbaugh the opportunity to destroy evidence. Ultimately, the government won, with the court concluding that the seizure of the records did not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Limbaugh will have the opportunity to petition for a rehearing on the suppression request in the near future. Incidentally, he has received unexpected support from the American Civil Liberties Union, which claims the government’s practice serves to threaten doctor-patient confidentiality.

Source: CNN.com


About the author

Quinlan Publishing Group in Boston offers critical and timely law enforcement information to its newsletter subscribers through a variety of publications. Summaries of important court cases, legal compliance information, technology updates, grants and funding information, news updates and helpful tips make up the content of these monthly newsletters. The newsletter titles are: Investigative Stops Bulletin; Search & Seizure Law Bulletin; Narcotics Law Bulletin; Police Department Disciplinary Law Bulletin; Police Grievances Law Bulletin; Arrest Law Bulletin; and Law Enforcement Management Bulletin.





PoliceOne Offers

Sponsored by

P1 on Facebook

Connect with PoliceOne

Mobile Apps Facebook Twitter Google

Get the #1 Police eNewsletter

Police Newsletter Sign up for our FREE email roundup of the top news, tips columns, videos and more, sent 3 times weekly
See Sample