Maritime terrorism and American policing
It’s encouraging to see that law enforcers are conducting a series of anti-terrorism training exercises this week at ports throughout California — from Oakland to Los Angeles, Long Beach, and San Diego. This tells me that at least some agency administrators are looking at the water for what it is: a potential entry point for a terrorist attack. Our shores and our waterways are America’s largest — and least protected — border.
Included in the more than 12,383 miles of U.S. maritime border, we have coastline on the Atlantic, the Pacific, and the Arctic Oceans (remember that Alaska has 5,580 miles of oceanfront property), as well as the Gulf of Mexico. We have countless offshore islands, sounds, bays, rivers, and creeks along those coasts. We have the Great Lakes, which gives access to eight different states. We have Puget Sound and its access to almost the entire area of northwest Washington. We have numerous smaller lakes, rivers, and unnamed streams which cross between the U.S. and our neighbors to the north.
The lesson here is that America is not only vulnerable to attack from the well-known oceanic borders, but that our enemies will eventually learn of these other, smaller, lesser-known potential points of entry as well.
Learning from History, Looking Ahead
While none of these attacks were successful military operations, their success in terms of a modern terrorist operation should be considered by law enforcement — you can bet that it’s being considered by the terrorists. The specific objectives of each operation were to either attack quickly, destroying whatever military targets possible and then slip away, or to conduct sabotage operations against specific targets.
In each case there was either little or no damage inflicted or the saboteurs were captured prior to completing their missions. But what if their targets had been the American psyche? What if these attacks were to take place today?
If determined to do so, there is no reason that a small group of foreign operatives could not cross into America via the vast maritime border. Once ashore they could either move to any one of several major cities such as Seattle, Chicago, Detroit, or Buffalo and conduct shocking mass attacks. Or they could melt into the local surroundings and make their way to the numerous hydroelectric dams, water reservoirs, transportation hubs or major recreational centers which are purposely located along these attractive waterways.
Before you dismiss the possibility of a successful modern maritime attack, consider the fact that this is exactly how the 2008 Mumbai attacks began. Ten gunmen crossed from Pakistan via a hijacked fishing trawler and used small rubber dinghies to reach shore. Over the next three days these gunmen were responsible for at least 10 coordinated shootings and bombings throughout the city and were responsible for killing at least 173 and wounding an additional 308 personnel.
Even if these attacks were unsuccessful, or discovered by authorities before being played out, the very fact that they were able to be put in motion would cause many who live along our nation’s waterways to be gripped by an immobilizing fear.
Furthermore, unlike the attempts of World War II, modern technology would make it near impossible for authorities to keep such an event secret. Thus, the fear would not be contained to only those areas directly affected but would instead cause a wave of fear which would resonate across the nation and terrorists will have accomplished one of their main goals — terror.
Perhaps there is one more lesson to be learned — this time courtesy of Paul Revere’s warning, “One if by land, two if by sea” — that may lead us all to dust off our lanterns.
|Back to previous page|