The long-term evolution of public safety communications
Public safety organizations have endorsed LTE as the next generation of wireless technology for use in the 700 MHz public safety spectrum — so what, exactly, is LTE?
Last week we reported on new movement in the D-Block, and now we examine a flurry of recent announcements about the broadband technology standard called 3GPP Long Term Evolution (a.k.a. LTE) — a project of the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) — which indicate that public safety broadband communications in the 700 MHz band assigned to public safety is really, truly moving forward toward fruition. For proof we need to look no further than just three pieces of news in just the past six weeks from technology giants Motorola, Alcatel-Lucent, and Ericsson:
Let’s take them in order, one by one.
In late July 2010, Motorola announced plans to build a 700 MHz LTE system that will serve a host of Bay Area public safety agencies including those in San Francisco, Alameda County/Oakland, Contra Costa County, as well as the cities of Santa Clara and Sunnyvale. The company said that this Public Safety LTE system, funded in part by a $50.6 million government grant as well as $21.9 million in investment from Motorola, “will be installed this year and is expected to be operational in early 2011. This first phase includes an LTE core, 10 sites and 330 Motorola Public Safety LTE user modems to provide Bay Area responders access to a host of media rich applications delivered over the new broadband network for increased public safety information sharing.”
Last week, Alcatel-Lucent announced that it completed “the world’s first call” over an LTE network — albeit an experimental one — operating within public safety broadband spectrum. In making that announcement, Morgan Wright, an occasional contributor to PoliceOne who now serves as Vice President of Global Public Safety Segment for Alcatel-Lucent said in a statement, “This achievement represents an important step toward revolutionizing public safety networks as it establishes the readiness of LTE as a technology to enable broadband data applications... This call also demonstrates Alcatel-Lucent’s expertise in designing and deploying LTE solutions to address the unique needs of the public safety sector and marks an important milestone in support of the Public Safety solution that Alcatel-Lucent is delivering to this critical market.”
And just today (September 7, 2010), Motorola and Ericsson announced a partnership to provide an LTE-based solution for public safety. One piece that can easily be lost int this announcement is that Ericsson is widely considered the worldwide leader in LTE infrastructure deployment, and of course, Motorola is the one of the top companies making public safety radio communications equipment. In making the announcement, both companies noted that their platform will provide “advanced capabilities demanded by public safety,” and will use LTE mobile broadband technology “to allow Motorola’s unified next generation platform to provide the advanced communications capabilities demanded by public safety with real-time information sharing between an integrated multimedia command center and a collaborative portfolio of rugged radios, in-vehicle terminals, and handheld LTE data devices.”
Seeds Sewn in Spring are Harvested in Fall
“Emergency responders,” said NIST, “will see how these broadband systems will function and determine through hands-on experience how these systems meet their unique needs... Features and system performance that commercial carriers may not be testing for commercial purposes, but that are of importance to public safety, will be a primary area of assessing public safety user requirements within the 3GPP LTE standard. This will include multicast/broadcast capabilities, priority access, pre-emption, SMS, and voice. Vendors who are developing LTE equipment (Band Class 14) are eligible to participate in this project.”
What, Exactly, is LTE?
With that in mind, we should note that LTE 3GPP Release 8 is considered a 3.9G technology — the stepping stone toward LTE Advanced, which is a true fourth generation (4G) mobile broadband standard that is the planned successor to 3G technologies such as GSM and UMTS. The expectation for 4G systems is to provide lightning fast download rates of up to 100 Megabits per second — exponentially faster than current 3G capabilities. Many wireless industry observers have said that for average consumers, LTE at those speeds could easily replace traditional DSL and cable Internet services.
One of the key things to know about LTE is that it is likely to become a truly global standard, with announced support from the likes of Bell Mobility, China Telecom, Telus Mobile, MetroPCS, France Télécom, Telefónica, Telecom Italia, T-Mobile, Vodafone, AT&T, and many more mobile carriers worldwide.
Why does that matter? Quite simply because a true worldwide cellular standard has been one of the industry’s goals for many years, and the fact that such a global standard appears close may push many holdout companies and concerns to put their support in the LTE corner. Notably during CTIA wireless industry trade show a few months ago, Sprint Nextel and Clearwire — the key developers of rival WiMAX — were reported to admit that even they may adopt LTE sometime down the road.
Why Did Public Safety Choose LTE?
As was mentioned above, LTE — which had been adopted by wireless giants AT&T and Verizon as their 4G standard for wireless development — beat out a rival technology called WiMAX, a technology standard which had been developed by Sprint and Clearwire.
But why did public safety choose LTE? In essence, it was a matter of expediency — LTE was simply more closely aligned with the public safety 700 MHz radio band.
Harlin McEwen, who serves as Chairman of the Communications & Technology Committee for the IACP and as Chairman of the Public Safety Spectrum Trust explains, “The only reason we chose LTE over WiMAX was that we had spectrum at 700 MHz and WiMAX was not developing any standards for 700. Verizon and AT&T had both announced that they were going to use LTE in 700, so it wasn’t a hard choice for us to say, ‘If we’re going to move into the next generation, we’ve got to work on the coattails of these two big companies who are going to develop 700 MHz systems.’ Nobody is going to build WiMAX in there unless somebody buys some spectrum to do that, and the only spectrum left is D-Block. And that’s not enough to do a robust system — that’s why we keep telling people, ‘Give us the D-Block to add to ours and we’ll have enough [spectrum] to do a robust system. Alone, we don’t have enough and the D-block doesn’t have enough.’ So that’s the reason we chose LTE. It had nothing to do with the technology being better than WiMAX. I’ve been told that although they’re different, there isn’t a lot of difference in the way they perform or the quality of the service.”
McEwen concludes, “We’re really talking about fourth generation — next generation, faster quicker, better, improved — broadband service, and LTE is the one we chose. But to the rank and file police officer or firefighter, they don’t care which one we use — they just want it to work.”
|Back to previous page|