The attack cascade: Engaging an offender before it's too late
We don't wait until water goes from horizontal to vertical to start furiously paddling a kayak, so why do we wait until an offender strikes to start dealing with non-compliance?
When does a waterfall start? If you wait to furiously paddle your kayak until the water goes from horizontal to vertical you will be swept away. Just like a waterfall starts upstream, an attack or escape begins cascading long before the fists or feet fly.
No batter waits for a pitcher to make a throw before taking a swing. They make their decision based on practiced observations of pitcher behavior. Cops should be trained to act based on behavioral cues of attack or flight, rather than to react to an attack at its peak. Critics would call this response preemptive, but the reality is that, just like the batter’s swing based on the pitcher’s windup, the fight has begun before the first blow is struck. We’ll rely on science to justify our actions in the courts.
With the offender who senses a threat — “Crap! I’m going to jail!” — his primitive brain alerts the body and starts the adrenaline for fight or flight. Depending on the magnitude of the threat, according to that individual’s perceptions, the primitive brain can override the thinking process and take over the body — “I don’t know why I ran, officer. I just did!”
If the threat is not overwhelming, the primitive brain gives the thinking brain a little time to mull things over. If the thinking brain has time to put the brakes on the primitive brain, it may decide that compliance is in the body’s best interest and the offender follows your instructions.
Or the thinking process may be to develop an escape plan.
Can you know the difference?
Subtle and not-so-subtle manifestations of this mental process show up in the body seconds before gross body movements of fight or flight present. I call this process the cascade sequence. Just like we don’t want to start paddling until we’re over the brink, we don’t want to start dealing with non-compliance until the offender strikes.
Our fear of tackling a nervous, but complaint, offender creates an intervention delay that can result in more suspect and officer injury. We’re trying to make the decision about whether this person is just nervous because of the police contact and all of its consequences, or if the body is just waiting for the best time to fight or escape.
Is Cascading Different for Compliant and Non-Compliant Offenders?
In general, compliant nervousness will manifest in the offender’s body position being square with the officer and concentrated on his own existing space rather than angled or gradual positioning for fight or flight. Nervous jitters will center in the hands and voice of a compliant subject.
Compliant subjects may talk more — speech requires brain cells that are not available to the person contemplating for fight or flight. Physical preparation of the non-compliant is going to the shoulders, elbows, feet, hips, and knees for fight or flight. The compliant person is bracing for submission and will have nervous hands and fingers rather than the large muscle groups. The submissive will more likely maintain eye contact with you — the non-compliant will be scanning for targets, confederates, or escape routes.
Arrest-control scenario training is currently centered on responding to the gross motor movements of an attack in progress (“defensive” tactics). We aren’t likely to authentically reproduce genuine, subtle, fear based fight or flight behavior in role players because those are autonomic and impossible to mimic.
For now, your best training in early intervention in the cascade sequence is your own experience put to use.
|Back to previous page|