Chicago withdraws objection to release of shooting video
Both sides agree the camera that caught the incident was at a distance and the footage is of low quality
By Michael Tarm
CHICAGO — The city of Chicago did an about-face Wednesday, asking a federal judge to lift a protective order to allow the public release of video that shows a white police officer fatally shooting a black suspect in a car theft in 2013.
City attorneys said in a filing in U.S. District Court that it was dropping its opposition in light of Mayor Rahm Emanuel wanting a recently created special task force to review policies regarding the release of such videos.
"We recognize the (city's video release) policy needs to be updated, and while we await guidance from the Task Force on Police Accountability, we are working to be as transparent as possible," said Steve Patton, Emanuel's top legal adviser who heads the city's law department.
City attorneys had previously fought to keep video under seal until legal proceedings end in the case of Cedrick Chatman, the 17-year-old who was a suspect in a car theft when an officer killed him on Jan. 7, 2013.
U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman was scheduled to rule Thursday morning on whether to release the footage.
This all follows the Nov. 24 release of video showing a white officer fatally shooting black teenager Laquan McDonald 16 times in 2014. That led to protests and a federal civil rights investigation of Chicago's police department. The city fought the release of the McDonald video for more than a year, drawing sharp criticism and calls for the city to change how it deals with such cases.
According to court documents, a video from a high school's security camera recorded police chasing Chatman in the South Shore neighborhood and then one officer fatally shooting him. The primary dispute is over whether Chatman had something in his hand and turned toward police before he was shot; the city says he did, Chatman family lawyers say he didn't.
Investigators later said the object in Chatman's hand turned out to be a small box.
Both sides agree the camera that caught the incident was at a distance and the footage is of low quality.
There are videos from other security cameras, but attorneys say none capture the chase and the shooting as the main video in question.
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press
Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.