Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!


In Car Video Sponsors

In Car Video Feature

Fusion HD - The Compact, Affordable, Turnkey In-Car Video Solution
Fusion HD - The Compact, Affordable, Turnkey In-Car Video Solution

Featured Product Categories



Tips - Addressing video evidence at trial

June 24, 2008

PrintCommentRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Addressing video evidence at trial

Submitted by:
Doug Wyllie, PoliceOne Senior Editor


Val Van Brocklin says that for any video evidence used at trial, law enforcement officials ought to expect the following questions from the defense:

  • When and how was the recording made?
  • Who was in control of its production?
    • If not the police, when and how did it come into police possession or when and how did they otherwise gain access to it or become aware of it?
  • Who operated the recording equipment?
  • Who else played any role in the creation of the recording?
  • What are the details of the chain of custody?
  • Whether the recording is the actual, original, contemporaneous recording or a copy or re-recording of some sort?
  • Whether any editing or other changes have been done?
    • Who participated in any such editing or changes?

In most cases, Van Brocklin adds, the most important factor to the court is the testimony of a witness that what is recorded is a “fair and accurate” portrayal. Judges are familiar with these “buzz words” and expect to hear them before ruling on the tape’s admissibility. The judges in your jurisdiction might be used to slightly different buzz words so it’s worth knowing what they are. Variations include:

  • "true and correct likeness"
  • "faithful, fair and accurate portrayal"
  • "correct and accurate likeness"

“Your prosecutor will likely know your jurisdiction's particular buzz words and use them in questioning you,” Van Brocklin concludes.

Read more about digital video evidence here.



Back to previous page