Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Home  >  Topics  >  Stop and Frisk

July 30, 2014
PrintCommentRSS

NY judge rejects stop-frisk police union claims

Judge has rejected efforts by police unions to overturn a ruling concluding that stop-and-frisk tactics are sometimes discriminatory

Associated Press

NEW YORK — A judge has rejected efforts by police unions to overturn a ruling concluding that New York City's stop-and-frisk tactics are sometimes discriminatory.

Judge Analisa Torres issued the decision Wednesday. The unions had sued to get the ruling overturned after the city decided to settle the case. It agreed to make reforms to the program to ensure there is no discrimination against minorities.

The judge rejected the unions' claims the reputations of their members were damaged by the decision finding discrimination.

She says employees suffer no legally protectable harm to their reputation merely because their employer is found liable in a lawsuit. She also says they had no legal standing.

She says police unions can participate in a process to reform the stop-and-frisk program.

There was no immediate union response.

Associated PressCopyright 2014 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press






PoliceOne Offers