Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

August 11, 2013
PrintCommentRSS

Fort Hood victims want attack labeled terror

Why is Maj. Nidal Hasan's attack being tried as a case of workplace violence and not as an act of terror?

By Allen Breed and Ramit Plushnick-Masti
Associated Press

Army Maj. Nidal Hasan admits opening fire in 2009 at Fort Hood, killing 13 people. He has said he did it in an effort to stop his fellow soldiers from going to Afghanistan and killing his fellow Muslims.

So why is the November 2009 attack being tried as a case of workplace violence and not as an act of terror?

Expert Scott Silliman says it's because military law does not have a punitive article for terrorism. Hasan was on active duty and committed the acts on a military installation, and that is why he's being tried by court-martial.

Lawyers for the victims contend the government could administratively declare this a terrorist act so their clients could qualify for Purple Hearts and higher benefits. They filed a lawsuit last year over the administration's decision to treat the incident as workplace violence.

Associated PressCopyright 2014 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Copyright 2013 Associated Press






PoliceOne Offers

Sponsored by

P1 on Facebook

Connect with PoliceOne

Mobile Apps Facebook Twitter Google

Get the #1 Police eNewsletter

Police Newsletter Sign up for our FREE email roundup of the top news, tips columns, videos and more, sent 3 times weekly
See Sample