Dog-scent lineups too unreliable, Texas court rules
The court ruled they are too scientifically unreliable to form the basis of any conviction
By Chuck Lindell
AUSTIN, Texas — Tossing out the capital murder conviction of an East Texas woman, the state's highest criminal court affirmed Wednesday that dog-scent lineups — once considered an exciting advance in crime solving — are too scientifically unreliable to form the basis of any conviction.
Without the discredited scent lineup results, the remaining circumstantial evidence presented to Megan Winfrey's jury was too weak to establish guilt, the Court of Criminal Appeals said in a 7-2 ruling that acquitted Winfrey of capital murder and conspiracy to commit capital murder.
Copyright © 2013 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Recommended for you
Join the discussion
PoliceOne top 5
- 2 words that should never appear in your police report
- Okla. chief defends cop after TASER threat sparks controversy, video released
- UK police: 19 dead, roughly 50 injured after explosion at Ariana Grande concert
- NYPD: Train worker refused to open gate for cop pursuing shoplifter
- Officer makes history as NYPD's first female counter-sniper