911 for 911: Deploying dispatcher mutual aid during major incident response
When a 911 comms center becomes overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude of incoming calls during a disaster, TERT teams provide support
National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week is April 14-20, 2019. Public safety telecommunicators play a crucial role in serving as the lifeline between citizens and public safety agencies. In honor of their work, PoliceOne is featuring this article from our sister site, EfficientGov, on how Telecommunicator Emergency Response Taskforce teams provide dispatcher mutual aid during major incident response.
By Randall D. Larson, P1 Contributor
With the increased number of large-scale mass casualty incidents and major natural disasters in recent years, proficient emergency communications are more significant than ever. But what happens when a 911 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) becomes overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude of incoming calls during a disaster?
To address this need, Telecommunicator Emergency Response Taskforce (TERT) programs began developing at the state level in 2001 and, by 2005, became credentialed by the National Incident Management System (NIMS). By 2017, 23 states had active TERT programs. Public safety dispatchers on these teams complete FEMA-certified training courses and have authorization from their home agencies to deploy.
Since the program was formalized in 2009, these teams have responded to dozens of major emergencies – from East Coast hurricanes to West Coast wildfires. Their efforts have been shown to be critical during numerous recent disasters, and they have been recognized as an essential support resource to incident management.
The Need for Telecommunicator Mutual Aid
“Historically, nearly all areas of public safety have had some type of mutual aid program,” said Jonathan Jones, a 12-year veteran of emergency communications and currently the operations coordinator for the Athens-Clarke County 911 Center in Athens, Georgia. “911 communications did not. There was no one for a 911 center to call when it needed help.”
The concept of large-scale PSAP mutual aid had been used in Florida following Hurricane Andrew in 1992, which resulted in a formal program within the state in 1993. But it took another decade before the concept was established as an active resource, and then embraced on a national level.
California began to develop its TERT in 2017, and the state’s fledgling team experienced its first trial by fire, literally, during 2018’s devastating Camp Fire, assisting local PSAPs as the deadly inferno exploded across Butte County, turning day into night and reducing the town of Paradise to little more than ash. Over a four-week period, 144 dispatchers from 30 different agencies were deployed to assist at PSAPs and the Incident Command Post (ICP), as well as subordinate search and rescue bases and the animal rescue ICP.
Developing the Concept
The first emergent TERT program were developed in the aftermath of 9/11 by members of the North Carolina Chapter of the National Emergency Number Association (NENA). In September 2003, NC TERT deployed 19 telecommunicators to assist in four counties in the aftermath of Hurricane Isabel; further in-state TERT deployments were made in 2004 and 2005 to assist with hurricane-affected PSAPs. NC TERT’s first out-of-state deployment came in 2005 with Hurricane Katrina, to assist St. Tammany Parrish, Louisiana for 10 days.
The lessons learned in these early experiences helped provide guidelines that refined and solidified ensuing TERT programs. Among the concerns encountered by TERT during the Hurricane Katrina deployment were:
- Emergency Management Agencies (EMAs) were not aware of the TERT program or of local PSAP’s need for assistance;
- PSAPs were unaware of the availability of mutual aid;
- The TERT program was not identified as an established resource by the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC);
- PSAP mutual aid was not addressed by DHS/FEMA;
- Local/state governments attempted to treat PSAP mutual aid differently than other first responder mutual aid in terms of housing, travel, cost recovery and responder liability.
In response, TERT met with DHS and FEMA officials to discuss solutions, which led to the program being credentialed through NIMS (National Incident Management System), the establishment of training standards and the availability of funding through the Office of Domestic Preparedness. In 2006, the National Joint TERT Initiative (NJTI) was created, which became the national governance body for TERT, although individual states have their own coordinators and leadership. In May 2009, NJTI’s Model Recommendations for TERT Deployment were approved as a standard by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
“Initial deployments proved the need for a mutual aid response concept for 911 centers,” explained Jones, who also serves as deputy state coordinator for Georgia TERT, and is a board member on the National NJTI committee. The Georgia TERT program currently falls under oversight from the Georgia Emergency Management Agency and Georgia Chapters of APCO and NENA. The state’s TERT members must complete the FEMA IS-144 TERT Basic Course (developed in 2013 with NJTI), as well as Basic ICS and NIMS courses. TERT dispatchers must also have the approval of their PSAP supervisor to be considered for assignment to a team.
In 2017, Georgia TERT deployed six telecommunicators to Collier County, Florida during Hurricane Irma. Last year, eight TERT members deployed to Sampson County, NC, for Hurricane Florence, and last October, 13 were deployed from five different in-state teams to various areas in South Georgia. “These deployments continued to validate the importance and need for organized TERT programs,” Jones said. “But to that end, it reiterated the importance of considering requests for TERT teams sooner rather than later. TERT needs to be on the list of things to consider in planning, not after an incident has already occurred.”
Thinking Ahead on TERT
The duration of TERT responses average multiple days to weeks for PSAP to PSAP deployments, while field deployments of TERT-member tactical dispatchers to ICPs and the like range from less than 18 hours to several days.
“We did not want to rush into creating this program,” said Jamie Hudson, dispatch supervisor for California’s Elk Grove Police Department, with 26 years of law enforcement dispatch, who assumed the role of acting state TERT coordinator. “We knew the program needed to be comprehensive, but also that there were some unique deployment circumstances we would have to plan for. For instance, California agencies have been using field-deployed tactical dispatchers significantly in the past 20 years. We felt there needed to be an element for these resources included in this program.”
While California, with its newer TERT program, has the potential staffing of 7,000 public safety dispatchers across 58 counties, their PSAPs have routinely maintained minimum staffing levels and could not easily commit dispatchers to a one or two-week deployment. “Because of this,” Hudson said, “we needed to create and test models where mutual aid is brought in by individual shifts on a commuting basis as much as possible. This allows them to respond [with pay] on a day off, as opposed to creating significant staffing impacts at their PSAP.”
3 key steps to building a TERT program
These experiences have all proven the TERT concept’s merit, and there are more than a dozen states reported to have teams in development.
1. Learn from the framework
Jones recommends NJTI’s easy-to-follow framework for establishing a TERT program. “While considering the unique needs of Georgia, we felt it was very important to not completely deviate from the original mission of the NJTI, while having some variances based on regional or state need,” he said.
2. Bring everyone to the table
Hudson feels that one of the most important elements in creating California’s TERT program was to ensure all public safety disciplines are represented on the creation committee. “This allows a broad spectrum of potential needs to be addressed,” he said. “We also determined our state needed a Tactical Dispatch element as well as a commutable response element to deployments.”
3. Acquire and maintain commitment
Jones sees continuing expansion of the TERT initiative throughout states and regions that don’t currently have such a program, or lack support for developing one. “It’s worth it to take the necessary time and effort into building the program,” he urged. “Utilize 911 professionals from a variety of levels – line-level, supervisors, managers/directors, and so on. Involve your state associations – APCO and NENA chapters and your State Emergency Management Agencies. Understand EMAC and its reimbursement process. Reach out to agencies that have experienced the need for TERT to reveal where improvements can be made. Build TERT education into conference sessions in your state. We could not have gotten to the point we are currently at without the help of several TERT coordinators around the country, willing to share their manuals, MOUs, lessons learned, and other resources.”
Review and download the Standard for Telecommunicator Emergency Response Taskforce (TERT) Deployment:
APCO-NENA_ANS_1_105_2-2015_T by on Scribd
About the author
Randall D. Larson retired after 20 years in public safety communications, serving as a shift supervisor, trainer and field communications supervisor for the San Jose (Calif.) Fire Department. Larson was also the editor of 9-1-1 Magazine from 1995 to 2009 and its online version from 2009 to 2018. He currently resides among the northern California Redwoods writing in a number of fields of interest.