Los Angeles DA revamps evidence policy
The revised policies, issued in response to a civil rights lawsuit by the ACLU, are intended to ensure fair trials
By Dana Bartholomew
Daily News, Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey announced new policies Tuesday on how prosecutors must disclose evidence favorable to defendants facing criminal charges.
The policies, issued in response to a civil rights lawsuit by the ACLU, clarify how prosecutors must abide by a half-century-old U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding exculpatory evidence. Lacey said it was vital her prosecutors comply with the rule of law.
"The integrity of the criminal justice system requires that prosecutors play fair in seeking justice," Lacey, who took office in December, said in a statement. "When in doubt, we want our prosecutors to disclose the evidence and litigate its admissibility in a court of law."
The ACLU lawsuit, filed in July on behalf of criminal defense attorney Jeffrey Douglas, accused Los Angeles Sheriff Lee Baca and his department of concealing evidence of deputy assaults on Men's Central Jail detainees from criminal defense attorneys.
The suit also challenged a policy adopted by former District Attorney Steve Cooley that allegedly prevented — and in some cases explicitly prohibited -- prosecutors from disclosing evidence of police officer misconduct. In many cases, it claimed, abused inmates were regularly charged for the alleged assault of any deputy involved.
It said the system of Brady violations, named for the Supreme Court case, may have barred numerous defendants from receiving a fair trial.
The ACLU dropped its lawsuit early this year after Lacey agreed to address how her office disclosed evidence of misconduct by police officers and other government workers. The advocacy group praised the DA for directing such evidence be disclosed to criminal defendants as required by state and federal law.
"We commend her for demonstrating such strong leadership and taking seriously the district attorney's constitutional obligations to ensure fair trials," said Hector O. Villagra, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, in a statement.
Lacey's office claimed her two policies only summarized the existing legal obligations of local prosecutors. The ACLU maintains it represents a change in how evidence must be disclosed.
For example, evidence of officer misconduct not included in a so-called Brady Alert System, or database for offending officers, must now be presented to defense attorneys. The policies also require prosecutors fully disclose all evidence favorable to defendants, per state law, and not withhold potential evidence just because they think it's false.
Two weeks after the ACLU lawsuit, Baca quietly revamped his policy on how complaints of use of force were filed against jail deputies. Rather than be placed in inmate files, where they were likely not to be discovered by defense attorneys, complaints are now lodged in officer files. The ACLU later dropped its claims against the Sheriff's Department.
Copyright 2013 The Los Angeles Daily News
McClatchy-Tribune News Service
Recommended for you
Join the discussion
PoliceOne top 5
- DC cops' body cams won't be on while they monitor inauguration demonstrators
- Slain Fla. officer's cuffs used to arrest suspect
- Pa. cop sues Wal-Mart over termination for carrying gun on duty
- Video: Alleged Fla. cop killer refuses lawyer, shouts profanities in court
- Details emerge in shooting of Ariz. trooper by driver he sought to help