New technology to help in roadside drug testing

On the horizon in the not-too-distant future, officers could have handheld devices to check for drug use in drivers

So you pull over the vehicle because the driver can’t decide which lane he wants to use, and he’s not drunk. His eyes look downright weird, and he’s definitely buzzed, but you’re not a DRE and there aren’t any handy. There may be some technology in the pipeline to make your life a little easier.

Two devices under development may make presumptive drug influence testing as easy as alcohol influence testing is with a preliminary breath tester. They rely on different techniques, and you won’t be seeing them by Christmas, but hey, dare to dream, okay?

The technology developed by the University of East Anglia in the UK is from a spin-off company called Intelligent Fingerprinting. It analyzes perspiration contained in a latent fingerprint for metabolites of cannabis, cocaine and opiates. A metabolite is a substance created when a drug is broken down, or metabolized, in the body. The developers believe it can be adapted to recognize other drugs, such as methamphetamine and MDMA (ecstasy).

The science behind the detection involves coating the fingerprint in a microfluidic solution of antibody-covered particles. When the antibodies combine with the drug or drug metabolites, the solution changes color. A second antibody fluoresces, making it possible to detect very low levels of drugs or metabolites. Antibodies are particles that remain dormant until they come into contact with the substances to which they are sensitive, then becoming active.

Intelligent Fingerprinting is already using the technology as an alternative to urinalysis for drug use. The company believes they can produce a handheld device within six months.

Nanoparticles and Microbeads
The other device under development will come from Philips, and uses a different technology developed by the U.S. Navy (your tax dollars at work). The Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC developed magnetic nanoparticles, called microbeads that would bind to biological warfare agents like anthrax and ricin. Then, giant magnetoresistant (GMR) sensors like the ones in a computer hard drive scan for the microbeads. Philips expanded on this research to use an optical (as opposed to a magnetic) sensor that works on an odd-sounding process called frustrated total internal reflection, or FTIR. Philips has a lot of experience making optical sensors, since they produced some of the first CD drives. Philips is calling the new biosensor technology Magnotech.

With Philips’ device, an officer would have a suspected drug user place a test swab or strip in his mouth to collect some saliva. The sample would go into a cartridge for insertion into the handheld analyzer. In less than 90 seconds, a display would show whether cocaine, cannabis, amphetamine or methamphetamine was present in the sample.

Sensitivity of the test is at the level of parts per billion, using a single microliter (one one-millionth liter) of saliva. Tests for other substances, such as cardiac enzymes present after a heart attack, have been reliable at levels 1000 times lower than those for drugs of abuse.

How much will these cost? At first, they’ll probably be prohibitively expensive for most agencies, and there will have to be field testing and the usual court challenges where the defense bar will attempt to have them labeled as voodoo. But if the science works as expected, these will be prime candidates for funding with traffic safety grants, and the street cop will have another tool for getting impaired drivers off the road.

About the author

Tim Dees is a writer, editor, trainer, and former law enforcement officer. After 15 years as a police officer with the Reno Police Department and elsewhere in Northern Nevada, Tim taught criminal justice as a full-time professor and instructor at colleges in Wisconsin, West Virginia, Georgia, and Oregon.

He was also a regional training coordinator for the Oregon Dept. of Public Safety Standards & Training, providing in-service training to 65 criminal justice agencies in central and eastern Oregon.

Tim has written more than 300 articles for nearly every national law enforcement publication in the United States, and is the author of The Truth About Cops, published by Hyperink Press. In 2005, Tim became the first editor-in-chief for, moving to the same position for at the beginning of 2008. He now writes on applications of technology in law enforcement from his home in SE Washington state.

Tim holds a bachelor’s degree in biological science from San José State University, a master’s degree in criminal justice from The University of Alabama, and the Certified Protection Professional credential from ASIS International. He serves on the executive board of the Public Safety Writers Association.

Dees can be reached at

Keep up on the latest products by becoming a fan of PoliceOne Products on Facebook

Request product info from top Police Technology companies

Thank You!

= required Error occured while sending data

By submitting your information, you agree to be contacted by the selected vendor.

Join the discussion

Brand focus

Sponsored content
7 types of technologies you need to build a body-worn camera solution

7 types of technologies you need to build a body-worn camera solution

A body-worn camera program can be built effectively if all the elements are in place

logo for print