DOJ tweaks terror probe rules
By Lara Jakes Jordan
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department, in a nod to concerns that Americans could be investigated in terrorism cases without evidence of wrongdoing, said Tuesday it will tweak still-tentative rules governing FBI national security cases before they are issued.
The changes represent a small but first victory for skeptical lawmakers and civil liberties groups that want the department to delay the rules until a new president is elected.
Not all of the planned changes were outlined during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, but Assistant Attorney General Elisebeth Cook said they would include limits on the length and kinds of investigative activities used in monitoring demonstrations and civil disorders.
"We do anticipate making changes in response to the comments we have received," Cook said. Justice Department and FBI lawyers have been briefing lawmakers and interest groups on the rules for the last six weeks.
The short hearing came as three Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee demanded "bare-minimum" civil rights protections for U.S. citizens and residents as the FBI expands its power to seek out potential terrorists.
"The Justice Department's actions over the last eight years have alienated many Americans, especially Arab and Muslim Americans," Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin, Russ Feingold and Edward M. Kennedy wrote Tuesday to Attorney General Michael Mukasey.
The rules, known as attorney general guidelines, will update how agents conduct interviews as the FBI shifts from a traditional crime-fighting agency to one whose top priority is protecting the United States from terrorist attacks.
The Justice Department says the guidelines will merely streamline existing authorities used in criminal and national security investigations. But critics call them a broad expansion of FBI powers that could result in racial, ethnic or religious profiling without any evidence of a crime.
The government initially wanted to issue the guidelines by Oct. 1, but Cook indicated Tuesday that was unlikely. She said, however, that the Justice Department expected to finalize the new rules in the near future.
A growing group of House and Senate lawmakers - comprised of both Democrats and Republicans - has urged Mukasey to release the policy to the public before it takes effect, allowing scrutiny and easing concerns about rule-making done in secret.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said after the hearing that he remains "skeptical" about how well the guidelines will work, but maintained they "could represent an improvement" over current policy.
The panel's top Republican, Sen. Christopher Bond of Missouri, called the guidelines "a remarkable improvement" and said they should be issued immediately.
If Mukasey finalizes the guidelines in the waning days of the Bush administration, Durbin, Feingold and Kennedy demanded that they at least include what they called "bare minimum" safeguards. Those protections include:
*Explicitly banning surveillance or other investigative activity based on a suspect's race, ethnicity, national origin or religion. The Justice Department maintains that the guidelines do not - and will not - allow investigations to be opened based only on such factors.
But the senators noted that traffic stops and other routine law enforcement activity specifically prohibit officials from considering race or ethnicity in any way, and urged Mukasey to adopt the same standards in national security cases.
*Require some factual proof, allegations or other grounds, known as predicate, for opening inquires that fall short of an investigation. The draft guidelines would allow surveillance, interviews and other intrusive activity of Americans without evidence of a crime.
*Require specific plans to protect information that the FBI collects about U.S. citizens and residents, particularly in gathering foreign intelligence data.
Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Recommended for you
Join the discussion
PoliceOne top 5
- DC cops' body cams won't be on while they monitor inauguration demonstrators
- Slain Fla. officer's cuffs used to arrest suspect
- Pa. cop sues Wal-Mart over termination for carrying gun on duty
- Pa. troopers union criticizes plan to scrap lie-detector tests for recruits
- Details emerge in shooting of Ariz. trooper by driver he sought to help