Fort Hood victims want attack labeled terror
Why is Maj. Nidal Hasan's attack being tried as a case of workplace violence and not as an act of terror?
By Allen Breed and Ramit Plushnick-Masti
Army Maj. Nidal Hasan admits opening fire in 2009 at Fort Hood, killing 13 people. He has said he did it in an effort to stop his fellow soldiers from going to Afghanistan and killing his fellow Muslims.
So why is the November 2009 attack being tried as a case of workplace violence and not as an act of terror?
Expert Scott Silliman says it's because military law does not have a punitive article for terrorism. Hasan was on active duty and committed the acts on a military installation, and that is why he's being tried by court-martial.
Lawyers for the victims contend the government could administratively declare this a terrorist act so their clients could qualify for Purple Hearts and higher benefits. They filed a lawsuit last year over the administration's decision to treat the incident as workplace violence.
Copyright 2013 Associated Press
Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Recommended for you
Join the discussion
PoliceOne top 5
- DC cops' body cams won't be on while they monitor inauguration demonstrators
- Slain Fla. officer's cuffs used to arrest suspect
- Pa. cop sues Wal-Mart over termination for carrying gun on duty
- Details emerge in shooting of Ariz. trooper by driver he sought to help
- Video: Alleged Fla. cop killer refuses lawyer, shouts profanities in court